Take for example an excerpt from a recent post
What the OP Clerk doesn't know is that since his fortunate departure we added many new instructors.
Besides our employees, we have 3 new certified instructors.
Our instructors have decades of experience in firearms training both in and out of law enforcement, the FBI and the Military. One of our new instructors is a NRA Counselor (those are the guys who teach the teachers).
Another of our new instructors is a martial arts expert with Black Belts in Tae Kwon Do and Jaga Do (combat knife fighting) who has trained extensively in Chinese Kenpo and Wing Chung Kungfu . He is recognized as Head Instructor by no less than three styles of Karate. He is also a FBI and US Department of Homeland Security trained firearms instructor in rifles, shotguns and pistols (can you see where we are headed with our self defense classes?)
Our instructors have decades of experience in firearms training both in and out of law enforcement, the FBI and the Military. One of our new instructors is a NRA Counselor (those are the guys who teach the teachers).
Another of our new instructors is a martial arts expert with Black Belts in Tae Kwon Do and Jaga Do (combat knife fighting) who has trained extensively in Chinese Kenpo and Wing Chung Kungfu . He is recognized as Head Instructor by no less than three styles of Karate. He is also a FBI and US Department of Homeland Security trained firearms instructor in rifles, shotguns and pistols (can you see where we are headed with our self defense classes?)
Yet, more recently there have
and we have to wonder, what the heck are they thinking?
They have claimed in several recent posts that their "training staff" has "over 100 years experience" in one post and "over 107 years of experience" in another.
We would like to link to these claims, but the blogger
has removed them from their blog.
Who exactly is doing their training?
What are their credentials?
That's our point. They've made the claim that their instructors "have decades of experience in firearms training both in and out of law enforcement, the FBI and the Military." Knowing this, you might want to also know they've made this claim - The fact is that after a lifetime as a police officer it is hard to see the world through a civilian eyes. The former officer often fails to understand that you probably don't want and certainly don't need need police training.Instead you need instruction for civilians and you need practice -- practice that is as close to the real thing as possible....
I guess they can't make up their mind.
And they still fail to post their instructor roster. Who they are? Why they're so good. And what you can expect to learn from their instruction?
We've posted our instructor roster, we have nothing to hide. That's our point. If you're making claims, and later removing or editing them, can you be trusted to be telling the truth? Or are you just making claims and hoping people will buy them sight unseen?
What is the truth?
